Tag: J.K. Rowling

  • Edinburgh Guide Reveals Why Harry Potter Tours Stopped: ‘I Was Uncomfortable Platforming Her in My City’

    Edinburgh Guide Reveals Why Harry Potter Tours Stopped: ‘I Was Uncomfortable Platforming Her in My City’

    For years, Harry Potter tours have been a staple of Edinburgh’s tourism scene, drawing countless fans to the cobbled streets and cozy cafes where author J.K. Rowling famously penned parts of the globally beloved series. But Fraser Horn, founder of Edinburgh Street Historians, says the time has come to let the magic go—and make room for something more meaningful.

    In an exclusive essay originally shared with PinkNews, Horn revealed his decision to permanently retire the popular Harry Potter-themed walking tours. Starting this July, they will be replaced by LGBTQ+ history tours that delve into Edinburgh’s queer past, offering stories of resilience, activism, and community.

    A Difficult but Necessary Decision

    “This decision was not made lightly,” Horn wrote. “Although I wanted out of Potter ever since J.K. Rowling’s essay in 2020, the simple fact of the matter is that the story is so deeply ingrained in the Edinburgh tourism industry that it feels almost impossible to dislodge.”

    Horn, who began guiding tours in 2019 and launched his independent venture Street Historians in February, explained the profound impact the Harry Potter books once had on him.

    “I was about 11 when I first got into Harry Potter. The kid looked a lot like me at the time,” he said. “It was an instant classic of a kids’ book. But we all grew up after the series ended—some of us into decent people, others into cartoon villainy.”

    The final decision to drop Potter came after the success of his LGBTQ+ history tour and Rowling’s recent controversial political activity. The author publicly celebrated a U.K. Supreme Court ruling criticized for its impact on trans rights, an action that Horn says made the decision clear.

    “I was motivated to drop Potter for Pride Month because of the recent Supreme Court decision which will make our trans siblings unsafe,” he wrote. “Rowling has confirmed she donated money to the organization that advocated for the court decision and celebrated with a cigar picture on a boat, which made me want to drop Potter even more.”

    From Fantasy to Fact: Embracing LGBTQ+ History

    Horn’s new focus is the LGBTQ+ history walking tour, which runs every Friday at 6 p.m. It explores overlooked narratives, from medical innovators to Cold War spies to the impact of the AIDS crisis and LGBTQ+ activism in reshaping modern Scottish society.

    “It is essential stuff,” Horn said. “Guests have been making friends, and these are the kind of life-long connections from which community is made.”

    The decision has largely been met with overwhelming positivity. “People who have come on the LGBTQ+ tour love having an event which is a bit different from the standard fare, both in terms of walking tours and queer events,” he noted.

    However, Horn acknowledged that some in the community were skeptical. “Some thought I was doing it for the wrong reason: rainbow capitalism, or purely to make money for Pride before switching back to Potter tours,” he said. “It’s fair that the community might expect this sort of thing—companies change very quickly.”

    Horn pointed to Barclays Bank as an example. “They have a very proud LGBTQ+ section,” he said, “then I read how they are banning trans people from using the toilets of their gender, based on the court ruling.”

    To be clear, Horn emphasized: “Potter will not be coming back to the Street Historians roster.”

    Reclaiming History and Telling New Stories

    While Harry Potter continues to be a major tourist draw—especially with an HBO Max reboot in production—Horn is more focused on amplifying historically marginalized voices.

    “We have been looking for more interesting stories to tell, for example, on forgotten women,” he said. “Even with significant economic considerations, it seems necessary for me to drop Potter.”

    Horn likens the shift in priorities to the moral themes found in many children’s books. “Some may be upset, but I guess that’s the lesson I took from the sort of books I read growing up,” he said. “We have to take a stand eventually or nothing will ever change.”

    The Edinburgh Street Historians will continue to offer pay-what-you-want walking tours, including their popular Old Town tour and the new LGBTQ+ history experience. Horn’s collaboration with LGBT Health and Wellbeing, a Scottish charity, has also deepened his commitment to using his platform to support queer communities.

    Street Historians aims to be more than just another tour company. “We’re fun, different, and the best way to see Edinburgh, in my view,” Horn said.

    Making Edinburgh Queerer, One Step at a Time

    Speaking to Gayety, the tour guide mentioned “I was uncomfortable platforming her in my city.”

    Horn’s move reflects a broader cultural shift among younger generations of travelers and LGBTQ+ allies seeking authentic, inclusive experiences that don’t gloss over real issues.

    With growing awareness around rainbow capitalism and the need for trans-inclusive advocacy, Horn believes walking tours like his can play a small but meaningful role in how cities confront the past—and create space for the future.

    “If any of those tourists are queer and want a tour that’s more important, they can book the LGBTQ+ one,” he said simply.

    For more information or to book a tour, visit Street Historians.

  • Edinburgh Tour Replacing Harry Potter Tours with LGBTQ+ History Walks Because of J.K. Rowling Comments

    Edinburgh Tour Replacing Harry Potter Tours with LGBTQ+ History Walks Because of J.K. Rowling Comments

    An Edinburgh-based tour company is making a significant shift this June by replacing its popular Harry Potter-themed walking tours with LGBTQ+ history tours in observance of Pride Month. Fraser Horn, founder of Street Historians, announced the change due to his growing discomfort with author J.K. Rowling’s controversial views on transgender rights.

    A Shift in Perspective

    In a heartfelt blog post, Horn expressed his internal conflict regarding the continuation of the Harry Potter tours. He noted that while the series had once been a source of joy and inspiration, Rowling’s public statements on transgender issues had overshadowed that connection. “There’s an increasing amount of negativity around the [Harry Potter] series which is making it much harder to conjure up affection,” Horn wrote. “For that reason, the Edinburgh Street Historians are having internal discussions.”

    Horn’s decision aligns with a broader movement within the tourism industry, where some businesses are reevaluating their associations with Rowling’s work due to her outspoken gender-critical stance. He emphasized the responsibility of tour operators to foster inclusivity and support marginalized communities. “If the world is becoming a less welcoming place, it’s our job to make the world more welcoming,” Horn stated.

    Celebrating LGBTQ+ History

    For the month of June, Street Historians is offering LGBTQ+ history tours that highlight the contributions and stories of queer Scots throughout history. These tours aim to educate participants about the rich and often overlooked LGBTQ+ heritage of Edinburgh, providing a platform for voices that have been marginalized in mainstream narratives.

    The LGBTQ+ tours will take guests across the city, visiting significant sites and sharing stories that celebrate the resilience and achievements of the LGBTQ+ community. Horn expressed that these tours are not just a replacement but a meaningful opportunity to honor and amplify queer histories.

    Community Reactions

    The response to Horn’s decision has been largely positive, with many expressing appreciation for his commitment to inclusivity. One supporter commented, “It’s refreshing to see a business take a stand for what is right, even when it means making difficult choices.” Others have noted that this move sets a precedent for other tour operators and businesses to consider the ethical implications of their associations.

    However, some Harry Potter fans have expressed disappointment, feeling that the series’ positive messages of acceptance and friendship are being overshadowed by the author’s personal views. One fan remarked, “It’s sad that something that brought so much joy is now tainted by controversy.”

    The Future of Harry Potter Tours

    Horn has indicated that the Harry Potter-themed tours may resume after June, but he remains uncertain about their future. He acknowledged the passion and enthusiasm of the guests who participate in these tours but also recognized the growing challenges in reconciling the series’ legacy with the author’s current stance. “There comes a point where it’s harder to justify,” Horn admitted.

    This sentiment reflects a broader conversation within the literary and entertainment communities about the separation of art from the artist. As public figures’ personal beliefs increasingly come under scrutiny, consumers and creators alike are grappling with how to engage with works that may conflict with their values.

    Broader Implications

    Horn’s decision is part of a larger trend where individuals and organizations are reassessing their associations with figures whose views may be considered harmful or exclusionary. In Edinburgh, other institutions have also taken steps to highlight LGBTQ+ histories during Pride Month. The Real Mary King’s Close, for example, is offering special Pride History Tours that delve into the lives of historical LGBTQ+ figures in the city. These initiatives aim to provide a more inclusive and accurate portrayal of history, ensuring that diverse narratives are acknowledged and celebrated.

    As Pride Month unfolds, the actions of Fraser Horn and other community leaders serve as a reminder of the importance of standing up for inclusivity and supporting marginalized communities. While the future of Harry Potter tours in Edinburgh remains uncertain, the city’s commitment to honoring its LGBTQ+ heritage continues to grow stronger.

    For those interested in participating in the LGBTQ+ history tours offered by Street Historians, bookings can be made through their official website. These tours provide an opportunity to learn about the rich and diverse histories that have shaped Edinburgh into the vibrant city it is today.

    Fraser Horn’s decision to replace Harry Potter-themed tours with LGBTQ+ history walks for Pride Month underscores the evolving nature of cultural engagement and the importance of aligning business practices with ethical considerations. As society continues to navigate complex issues surrounding identity and representation, such actions contribute to a more inclusive and thoughtful discourse.

  • Here Are Some Best Reactions to When The Internet Piled on J.K. Rowling After She Criticizing Asexuality

    Here Are Some Best Reactions to When The Internet Piled on J.K. Rowling After She Criticizing Asexuality

    J.K. Rowling, best known for her Harry Potter series and more recently for her controversial stance on transgender issues, has found herself at the center of another social media storm, this time over a comment she made about asexuality. On April 6, the author took to X (formerly Twitter) to criticize the observance of International Asexuality Day, a day meant to raise awareness about asexuality—a sexual orientation in which individuals do not experience sexual attraction to others.

    In her post, Rowling dismissed the day, writing, “Happy International Fake Oppression Day to everyone who wants complete strangers to know they don’t fancy a shag.” She accompanied her message with an infographic from Switchboard, a UK-based LGBTQ+ support organization. The graphic shared basic information about asexuality and is intended to help people understand the orientation, but Rowling’s tweet seemed to mock the day, its participants, and the community it aims to support.

    While the infographic offered no suggestion of oppression or divisiveness, Rowling’s interpretation of it was negative, sparking widespread backlash from those in the LGBTQ+ community and beyond. Many pointed out that the graphic simply provided a straightforward explanation of what it means to be asexual, with no overt political or social commentary attached.

    Rowling’s Comment Draws Quick Criticism

    Rowling’s tweet quickly drew a flurry of criticism, with many accusing her of being unnecessarily cruel and dismissive of a marginalized group. Despite her controversial views on transgender issues, her decision to target asexual individuals seemed to surprise even some of her most vocal critics. As many pointed out, the asexuality awareness campaign is a space for individuals to share their identities and experiences without judgment, yet Rowling’s comment felt like another attack from the author, whose recent public persona has been defined by her vocal opposition to transgender rights.

    The author, who has 14.3 million followers on X, also engaged with some of the comments supporting her post, adding sarcastic and combative responses. In one exchange, Rowling appeared to question the validity of asexuality, suggesting that asexual people may not be able to determine whether they are gay or straight. This seemed to underline her lack of understanding of the asexual experience, as many who identify as asexual do, in fact, have clear romantic and sexual identities that simply do not include sexual attraction.

    The response to her remarks came swiftly, with many pointing out the irony of Rowling’s lack of awareness about asexuality and its complexities. While some took issue with her mocking tone, others noted that her attack on asexuality was merely the latest in a series of targeted comments aimed at different corners of the LGBTQ+ community.

    Memes and Jokes Poke Fun at Rowling’s Remarks

    As expected, the internet quickly turned Rowling’s comments into a meme-worthy moment. Twitter users flooded the platform with humorous reactions to the author’s comments, using memes and satire to make light of her statement.

    “Us asexuals literally just minding our business. J.K. Rowling: AND YOU KNOW WHAT F*CK Y’ALL TOO,” one user wrote, encapsulating the frustration of those who felt unnecessarily attacked by the author. Other responses included mocking images, such as one where people joked about Rowling being told by “the mold” in her house to go after asexuals next. “J.K. Rowling killing the black mold in her house (it can reproduce asexually),” one user quipped, poking fun at her latest target in a light-hearted, albeit pointed, manner.

    Many comments reflected the absurdity of Rowling’s stance, with people calling out her consistent pattern of going after minorities, especially those within the LGBTQ+ community. “Anyone who’s not a cishet: [exists] JKR:” read another tweet, which highlighted the apparent inconsistency in Rowling’s selective critiques of different marginalized groups.

    Even more biting commentary pointed to Rowling’s apparent lack of comprehension when it comes to basic human relationships. One meme showed an image of Rowling as a “mould cultivator” who, ironically, didn’t understand the concept of romantic love or human connection outside of sexual attraction. “Renowned children’s author and rare mould cultivator Joan K. Rowling does not understand the concept of Romantic Love,” one user wrote, poking fun at her seeming disconnect from the complexities of human experience.

    The Author’s Ongoing Controversy

    J.K. Rowling has long been a polarizing figure, especially after her vocal opposition to aspects of transgender rights. Her statements on transgender issues sparked widespread condemnation from activists, fans, and the LGBTQ+ community, but it also garnered support from individuals who aligned with her views. However, her latest foray into criticizing asexuality has only added fuel to the fire, reinforcing the image of an author who seems intent on targeting various groups of marginalized individuals.

    Many of those responding to Rowling’s latest comments noted the irony of her actions. In 2024, she responded to accusations of transphobia by claiming that she was an advocate for the rights of women and children. Yet, in the wake of her comments about asexuality, many have pointed out that her consistent pattern of dividing and mocking people within the LGBTQ+ community doesn’t seem aligned with any genuine desire to support marginalized groups.

    Her recent post on International Asexuality Day stands as a stark reminder that Rowling’s brand of activism seems more focused on antagonizing and criticizing those who don’t conform to her worldview rather than fostering understanding or empathy.

    As backlash continues to grow, the question remains whether J.K. Rowling will ever take a step back from her ongoing campaign of controversy. Despite the widespread criticism, her loyal followers continue to rally behind her, defending her right to express her opinions. However, the broader LGBTQ+ community, including both asexual and transgender advocates, continues to call her out for what they view as harmful rhetoric.

    The larger cultural conversation surrounding Rowling’s views seems far from over, as each new post on her social media platforms invites more debate and more calls for accountability. Whether she will adjust her approach to these complex issues or double down on her controversial statements remains to be seen.

    For now, it’s clear that Rowling’s latest comments have further alienated her from a growing segment of the public, while memes and jokes about her perceived ignorance of asexuality and LGBTQ+ issues continue to circulate online. As International Asexuality Day reminds the world of the importance of recognizing all sexual orientations, J.K. Rowling’s recent comments serve as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for visibility, respect, and understanding for marginalized communities.

  • J.K. Rowling Slams ‘Left’ Over Trump’s Executive Order on Women’s Sports

    J.K. Rowling Slams ‘Left’ Over Trump’s Executive Order on Women’s Sports

    J.K. Rowling, the British author best known for creating the Harry Potter series, took to social media on Wednesday to voice her disapproval of those advocating for the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Rowling shared a photo of former U.S. President Donald Trump signing the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order, surrounded by applauding female athletes. The signing took place on National Girls and Women in Sports Day, a day dedicated to recognizing the achievements of women in sports and advocating for equal opportunities for female athletes.

    In her post, Rowling directed a sharp message to “the left,” claiming that their efforts to allow transgender women—biological males who identify as female—to compete in women’s sports had contributed to a harmful shift in society. “Congratulations to every single person on the left who’s been campaigning to destroy women’s and girls’ rights,” Rowling wrote. “Without you, there’d be no images like this.”

    The tweet was accompanied by a critical tone, as the author suggested that the push to allow transgender women in women’s sports had undermined women’s rights and safety. Rowling, who has been vocal about her views on the subject, continued her critique in another post, rejecting the argument that transgender inclusion affects only a small fraction of the population. “Why do you care about a tiny fraction of the population?” she remarked, dismissing the line as “utterly ridiculous.”

    Rowling’s stance on the issue has been clear for years, as she has consistently supported the notion of keeping biological males out of women’s sports. The Harry Potter author argued that the promotion of gender ideology has led to a significant erosion of fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, scientific truth, and protections for women and children. “Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women’s and girls’ safety, privacy and dignity,” she wrote. “It’s also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids. Nobody voted for it, the vast majority of people disagree with it, yet it has been imposed, top down, by politicians, healthcare bodies, academia, sections of the media, celebrities and even the police.”

    The author’s post suggested that those advocating for gender inclusivity in sports and beyond had been misled or were ignoring the negative consequences of such policies. “This movement has impacted society in disastrous ways,” Rowling said. “If you had any sense, you’d be quietly deleting every trace of activist mantras, ad hominem attacks, false equivalence and circular arguments from your X feeds.”

    In addition to her views on women’s sports, Rowling also made headlines last year when she criticized the BBC’s decision to award its Women’s Footballer of the Year award to Zambian soccer player Barbra Banda. Banda had previously withdrawn from the Zambian squad for the Women’s Africa Cup of Nations after failing to meet sex eligibility requirements. However, she was allowed to compete in the Paris Olympics and later became the second-leading scorer in the U.S. National Women’s Soccer League.

    Rowling took to social media to express her outrage, stating, “Presumably the BBC decided this was more time efficient than going door to door to spit directly in women’s faces.”

    Beyond her views on sports, Rowling has faced significant backlash for her outspoken criticism of transgender issues, particularly in relation to the Scottish Hate Crime Act. Signed into law last year, the legislation introduced a new crime of “stirring up hatred” against any of the protected groups covered by the bill, including transgender individuals. Rowling, a vocal critic of the law, has repeatedly expressed concern that it infringes on free speech and places limits on people’s ability to express their views on gender. She even challenged Scottish authorities to arrest her for calling “a man a man.”

    In previous social media posts, Rowling also highlighted several instances in which male criminals claimed to be transgender in order to be housed in female prisons. She cited examples of male criminals convicted of serious offenses, including child sexual assault, who had been allowed to identify as women before serving their sentences. The author used these examples to argue that transgender inclusion policies posed a threat to women’s safety.

    The issue of transgender inclusion in sports has been a contentious topic worldwide, with both sides of the debate fiercely defending their positions. Critics of transgender women competing in women’s sports argue that it creates an unfair advantage, given the physiological differences between men and women. Supporters of transgender rights, however, maintain that exclusion from sports is discriminatory and harmful to transgender individuals.

    Rowling’s stance on this issue has earned her both support and condemnation. While she has found an audience of supporters who share her concerns about the impact of gender ideology on women’s rights, she has also faced significant backlash from the LGBTQ+ community and allies who accuse her of transphobia. Despite the controversy, Rowling remains an active and vocal participant in the debate, particularly on social media platforms like X, where she has continued to share her views on the subject.

    As the debate over transgender rights in sports continues, Rowling’s comments are likely to fuel further conversations about the intersection of gender, equality, and fairness in athletics.

  • New ‘Harry Potter’ Series Adaptation Coming to HBO Max

    New ‘Harry Potter’ Series Adaptation Coming to HBO Max

    A new Harry Potter series is coming to HBO Max and Discovery+’s new streaming service. (more…)

  • Real-Life Quidditch Wants Distance From J.K. Rowling

    Real-Life Quidditch Wants Distance From J.K. Rowling

    Even the real-life Quidditch sport is trying to distance themselves from J.K. Rowling.

    (more…)

  • J.K. Rowling Not Returning for HBO Max Harry Potter Reunion

    J.K. Rowling Not Returning for HBO Max Harry Potter Reunion

    Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone is turning 20 years old!

    (more…)