Tag: Meta

  • Elon Musk’s Trans Daughter Responds to Father’s Controversial Comments About Her Transition

    Elon Musk’s Trans Daughter Responds to Father’s Controversial Comments About Her Transition

    Elon Musk’s relationship with his children has been the subject of public scrutiny for years, and recently, his trans daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, has spoken out in response to his controversial remarks about her transition. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is believed to have fathered 14 children. Among them, only four are known to be female, including Wilson, who transitioned from male to female. Her mother is Musk’s ex-wife, author Justine Wilson.

    Musk’s other daughters include Azure and Arcadia, children he shares with his partner Sharon Zilis, and Exa Dark Sideræl, his child with the musician Grimes.

    In 2021, Forbes highlighted Musk’s “engineering approach to reproduction” after learning that his first five children, including Vivian, were conceived via in vitro fertilization (IVF). The article speculated about the possibility of sex-selective IVF, a practice that is illegal in many countries. This speculation led to rumors about Musk potentially using sex-selective IVF for his children, which have continued to swirl in the years since.

    Now, Vivian has addressed these ongoing rumors directly, alleging that her father paid to ensure she was born male. On March 9, 2025, Wilson took to Threads, a social media platform owned by Meta, to share her side of the story. In a post, she wrote, “My assigned sex at birth was a commodity that was bought and paid for. So when I was feminine as a child and then turned out to be transgender, I was going against the product that was sold.”

    Photo: Threads/@vivllainous
    Photo: Threads/@vivllainous

    Musk’s public response to his daughter’s transition has been widely criticized. In July 2024, during an interview with right-wing commentator Jordan Peterson, Musk referred to Wilson’s transition as a consequence of the “woke mind virus.” Throughout the conversation, Musk misgendered Wilson, describing her as “my son” and claiming that her transition was coerced, saying, “I was essentially tricked into signing documents for one of my older boys… I was told [Vivian] might commit suicide. It’s incredibly evil… the people promoting this should go to prison.”

    Musk also claimed that he was unaware that puberty blockers, a common part of the transition process, could result in sterility, saying, “I lost my son, essentially.” He further stated, “They call it deadnaming for a reason. The reason is your son is dead. My son is dead, killed by the woke mind virus. I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that.”

    In response to these inflammatory remarks, Vivian has been vocal in challenging her father’s claims. She posted a series of messages on Threads, mocking Musk’s comments about her being “dead.” “Last time I checked I am, indeed, not dead,” she wrote. In another post, she quipped, “I look pretty good for a dead b**ch.”

    Wilson also took issue with Musk’s claim that she was “slightly autistic” as a child, linking this to her gender dysphoria. She dismissed this as “entirely fake,” saying, “None of this ever happened. Ever. I don’t even know where he got this from. My best guess is that he went to the Milo Yiannopoulos school of gay stereotypes, just picked some at random and said: ‘Eh, good enough.’”

    Many social media users have shown support for Wilson’s stance, with one person commenting, “I’m so sorry, as a mother and grandmother, I can’t emotionally wrap my brain around a parent not loving and supporting their child. I’ll spare you my thoughts on that man, I’ll just say that man is soulless. Anyone who turns their back on their child is a deficient human. All the love to you.”

    Musk’s remarks about his daughter have drawn criticism from many, particularly in the LGBTQ+ community, where his statements are seen as harmful and misinformed. Wilson’s decision to speak out is seen as an important moment in the ongoing debate about parental support for transgender children and the challenges faced by individuals navigating gender identity within public families.

    As of now, it appears that the estranged relationship between Musk and Wilson remains a deeply personal and contentious issue, with the public battle continuing to unfold on social media.

  • Andrew McCaskill’s Career Hacks for Queer BIPOC Navigating DEI Rollbacks

    Andrew McCaskill’s Career Hacks for Queer BIPOC Navigating DEI Rollbacks

    As diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives face cutbacks at major companies like Amazon, Meta, and McDonald’s, (via Axios) professionals from marginalized communities are increasingly anxious about their career futures.

    The wave of rollbacks has left many queer individuals, Black professionals, and people of color questioning their job security and opportunities. Recent LinkedIn studies show that 69% of LGBTQIA+ professionals feel limited by the current political and economic climate, with one in five fearing job instability if they change positions. The data also reveals that 70% of LGBTQ+ professionals and 64% of Black professionals plan to seek new jobs in 2025, but over half say the job market has become significantly more difficult in the past year.

    Networking remains a key strategy for overcoming these challenges. LinkedIn research indicates that professionals are four times more likely to secure a job at a company where they have an existing connection. However, nearly 45% of Black professionals and 50% of LGBTQ+ professionals wish they had better tools to assess how their skills match potential roles.

    With companies scaling back DEI programs, marginalized professionals are left to navigate these difficulties on their own. This situation underscores the need for strategic career planning and resourcefulness, says Andrew McCaskill, a LinkedIn career expert and communications executive focused on empowering marginalized communities.

    McCaskill, the creator of the newsletter The Black Guy in Marketing, provides tailored career advice to professionals of color, women, and LGBTQ+ individuals. His advocacy for diversity in media and marketing helped bring LGBTQ+ audience measurement to Nielsen, ensuring better representation in TV, radio, and streaming analytics. Recognized as a diversity leader by Fortune magazine, McCaskill has also served as a global executive sponsor for Nielsen’s LGBTQ+ employee business groups. In 2023, Nike named him a #BeTrue Brand Ambassador to foster discussions about LGBTQ+ inclusion in sports.

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Drew In PR (@drewmccaskill)

    In light of the uncertainty in today’s job market, McCaskill urges professionals to take charge of their careers. “For gay folks, the cavalry is not coming for you,” he says. “That’s a tough statement, but once you accept that truth, the next step is taking your career progression into your own hands.”

    As DEI programs and employee resource groups disappear, McCaskill encourages professionals to create a personalized career strategy that prioritizes stability, growth, and alignment with personal values. “Your network, your skills, and using technology are going to be the pathways for people — especially from marginalized groups — not just to survive but to thrive,” he explains.

    McCaskill highlights LinkedIn as a vital tool for navigating the changing job market. He advises job seekers to maximize their profiles by listing all their skills, even those they might not enjoy but that enhance marketability. Tools like LinkedIn’s Job Collections can help professionals filter companies based on diversity commitments, paid leave policies, and work-life balance — as long as those companies still uphold those values.

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Drew In PR (@drewmccaskill)

    Additionally, McCaskill encourages users to turn on LinkedIn’s “Open to Work” feature in stealth mode, making them visible to recruiters without notifying their current employers. “Sixty nine million companies use LinkedIn as their primary tool to source talent — don’t sleep on that,” he says. He also recommends setting Job Alerts to target specific industries, roles, and locations, helping to streamline the job search process.

    Outside of LinkedIn, McCaskill emphasizes the importance of building a diverse support network. “Our non-Hispanic white counterparts can be great resources for decoding workplace culture, and straight colleagues can offer valuable insights,” he notes. A diverse network provides confidence, course correction, and context, especially when preparing for interviews, salary negotiations, or understanding industry norms.

    Despite the opposition to DEI initiatives, McCaskill’s advice offers a roadmap for marginalized professionals to not only survive but also thrive in an evolving job market. By honing their skills, leveraging technology, and developing strategic networks, professionals can take control of their careers and continue to grow amid these challenges.

    McCaskill also points to emerging job sectors that professionals should consider as they seek new opportunities, with further details available through LinkedIn News.

  • Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Allegedly Orders Removal of Tampons from Men’s Bathrooms in Controversial Policy Shift

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Allegedly Orders Removal of Tampons from Men’s Bathrooms in Controversial Policy Shift

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly ordered the removal of tampons from men’s bathrooms across the company’s offices in Silicon Valley, New York, and Texas. The move, which affects restrooms previously equipped with tampons for trans and nonbinary employees, is part of a broader series of policy changes at the company that critics say signal a shift toward more anti-LGBTQ+ stances.

    According to sources familiar with the decision, the removal of tampons is one of several actions in a sweeping series of changes that Zuckerberg has implemented in recent months. These changes, which some argue reflect a more conservative approach, have sparked outrage among employees and LGBTQ+ advocates.

    A Shift in Meta’s Policies

    The tampon removal follows other controversial policy changes at Meta, including the company’s decision to loosen its hate speech policies. Last week, Zuckerberg announced that the company would reduce its reliance on content moderators and fact-checkers, a move that will allow more controversial content to remain on its platforms. This includes content that may promote harmful rhetoric about LGBTQ+ individuals, such as referring to them as “mentally ill.”

    Meta also recently ended its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices in hiring, training, and supplier selection. These policies, which had been a key component of the company’s commitment to inclusivity, are now being rolled back. Additionally, Zuckerberg has reportedly authorized the deletion of nonbinary and transgender themes from Meta’s Messenger app, which had previously been available for several years.

    Zuckerberg’s Comments Fuel Backlash

    Zuckerberg’s recent actions appear to be part of a broader strategy to align the company with more conservative viewpoints, a shift that some believe is connected to the rise of Donald Trump’s political influence. In a recent interview with popular anti-LGBTQ+ podcaster Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg praised what he called “masculine energy” in business, while expressing optimism about Trump’s second term. Zuckerberg, a major political donor, is one of several tech CEOs who contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund.

    The CEO’s public remarks have fueled speculation that his decisions at Meta are increasingly influenced by his personal views, as well as a desire to align the company with the political climate that has gained momentum under Trump’s influence. In December, Zuckerberg convened a series of confidential meetings with top executives to discuss these changes, a departure from the company’s traditional decision-making process, which typically involves broader input from employees and leadership.

    Employee Reactions: Anger and Disillusionment

    The policy changes have been met with widespread anger from Meta’s workforce, particularly among employees who identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community. One employee told 404 Media, “No one is excited or happy about these changes. And obviously, the employees who identify as being part of the LGBTQ+ community are especially unhappy and feel the most unsupported in this. A small number of people are taking time off and are sharing that they are considering leaving the company due to this change.”

    Another Meta employee expressed frustration with the direction the company is taking, saying, “I find it very hard to understand how explicitly carving out which groups of marginalized people can have hate speech directed at them will be beneficial for the communities we hope to build on our platforms.”

    Widespread Criticism from LGBTQ+ Groups and Public Figures

    The changes have drawn sharp criticism from LGBTQ+ rights organizations and public figures, including President Joe Biden. Biden recently condemned Meta’s decision to remove fact-checking policies and loosen its hate speech guidelines, calling it “shameful” and expressing concern over the potential harm these changes could cause to marginalized communities.

    LGBTQ+ advocates have voiced particular concern about the tampon removal, arguing that it is part of a broader pattern of erasing support for trans and nonbinary individuals. “It’s a clear message that the company no longer values the needs and rights of LGBTQ+ employees,” said one advocate, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.

    Zuckerberg’s Political and Personal Views at the Forefront

    Several reports suggest that Zuckerberg’s policy changes are not just a response to shifting political dynamics in the U.S., but also a reflection of his personal views. Sources close to the company say that Zuckerberg, emboldened by Trump’s political success, is now more openly expressing his conservative leanings. One insider stated, “He no longer wants to keep those views quiet, and he is pushing Meta to reflect that.”

    The company’s pivot is seen as a direct response to what Zuckerberg perceives as a growing conservative movement in the United States, one that values traditional, “masculine” business practices and rejects what some view as the excesses of the previous era’s focus on diversity and inclusion.

    Impact on Meta’s Reputation and Future

    As Meta continues to roll out these controversial changes, the company’s reputation among its diverse employee base and the general public is being tested. Many employees fear that the company’s shift toward more conservative values will undermine the inclusivity that has been central to Meta’s image, especially among younger and more progressive demographics.

    The removal of tampons from men’s bathrooms, in particular, has ignited conversations about the importance of maintaining inclusive policies that recognize the needs of transgender and nonbinary individuals. Critics argue that such moves could alienate a significant portion of the LGBTQ+ community and damage Meta’s standing as a tech leader committed to social progress.

    While Zuckerberg’s decisions have sparked significant backlash, the CEO appears undeterred, confident that his approach will help position Meta for success in an increasingly polarized political climate. Whether this shift will pay off in the long run remains to be seen, as Meta navigates the complexities of balancing corporate values with the demands of an evolving social and political landscape.

  • LGBTQ+ Meta Employees Take Time Off for ‘Mental Health’ After Controversial Hate Speech Policy Change

    LGBTQ+ Meta Employees Take Time Off for ‘Mental Health’ After Controversial Hate Speech Policy Change

    Meta’s recent policy change, which allows users to make statements calling LGBTQ+ people “mentally ill” based on their sexual orientation and gender identity, has sparked a wave of backlash from the company’s LGBTQ+ employees. Several workers have reportedly taken time off to care for their mental health, expressing frustration over the decision, which they say fosters a toxic environment for marginalized communities.

    On Tuesday, January 7, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced significant changes to the company’s content moderation policies, including the removal of independent fact-checkers. These changes allow users to express opinions, including harmful and discriminatory views, without the same level of moderation that was previously in place. Under the new guidelines, it’s now acceptable for users to label LGBTQ+ people as “mentally ill” or make similar claims, particularly in the context of political and religious discussions about issues like transgender rights and homosexuality.

    The new policy shift, according to a statement from Meta’s updated hate speech guidelines, allows such terms to be used in what they call “common non-serious” ways. Specifically, it permits allegations of mental illness or abnormality tied to discussions about gender and sexual orientation, as long as these comments are framed within broader political or religious discourse. The updated guidelines state that terms like “weird” or “mentally ill” can be used to describe LGBTQ+ individuals due to the “political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”

    The backlash among Meta’s LGBTQ+ employees has been swift. According to reporting from 404 Media, many employees are taking time off from work in protest of the changes, citing the emotional and psychological toll the new policy has on their mental health. One employee posted on Meta’s internal platform, Workplace, expressing their distress: “I am LGBT and mentally ill. Just to let you know that I’ll be taking time out to look after my mental health.”

    The controversy has also drawn criticism from high-ranking Meta figures. Helle Thorning-Schmidt, co-chair of Meta’s Oversight Board, publicly voiced concerns about the policy change, particularly its potential impact on vulnerable groups like LGBTQ+ and transgender people. In an interview with BBC’s Today program, Thorning-Schmidt said she and others on the board were “very concerned” about the policy’s implications, especially in light of its timing ahead of President-elect Donald Trump’s anticipated return to the White House.

    “We’re very concerned about gender rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and trans people’s rights on the platforms because we are seeing many instances where hate speech can lead to real-life harm,” Thorning-Schmidt said. “We will be watching that space very carefully.”

    Meta’s decision to drop independent fact-checkers and content moderation has raised alarms among critics, who argue that it opens the door for more harmful content and less accountability for those who spread hate speech. LGBTQ+ advocates, including current and former Meta employees, have voiced worries that the policy change could lead to a more hostile online environment, particularly for vulnerable groups already at risk of discrimination and violence.

    Mark Zuckerberg, however, defended the new policies, stating that they were designed to “get back to our roots” and prioritize free expression on the platform. In a statement, he explained that the changes were part of a broader effort to reduce mistakes, simplify policies, and restore what he described as “the freedom of expression that the platforms were originally intended to uphold.”

    Critics have pointed out that the timing of the policy revision is concerning, particularly as it comes just weeks before Trump’s second term in office. With the political landscape shifting, many fear that the policy change is part of a broader trend to accommodate far-right rhetoric and divisive political views.

    The decision has sparked intense debate across social media platforms, with many calling on Meta to reconsider its new policy. LGBTQ+ advocates argue that the company is failing to prioritize the safety and well-being of its most vulnerable users. In contrast, supporters of the change argue that it is necessary to allow for more open discourse, even if that means tolerating controversial or offensive opinions.

    As the situation continues to unfold, Meta employees, LGBTQ+ activists, and policymakers are closely watching how the company will respond to the growing backlash. For now, many employees within the company are left grappling with the impact of the policy change, both personally and professionally, and questioning whether the company can balance free expression with the need to protect its users from harm.

  • Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Shifts Political Strategy Amid Trump’s Possible Return to Power

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Shifts Political Strategy Amid Trump’s Possible Return to Power

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent announcement that he would be ending professional fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram signals a significant shift in the company’s approach to political content. The decision, unveiled Tuesday, marks the culmination of months of efforts to position the social media giant to navigate the conservative pressures expected from a potential second term of Donald Trump.

    Zuckerberg, who has long been known for supporting progressive causes, appears to be recalibrating his company’s policies to align with a more right-leaning stance. In the past, Zuckerberg has engaged in high-profile meetings with former President Barack Obama and criticized his administration at times, particularly in matters related to privacy and tech regulations. However, over the last year, Zuckerberg’s actions have hinted at a clear pivot toward embracing conservative influences.

    The first sign of this shift came in July 2024, when Zuckerberg publicly praised Trump’s defiant response after an assassination attempt, calling it “one of the most badass things I’ve ever seen.” Although Zuckerberg quickly clarified that he was not endorsing any presidential candidate, the comment set the stage for what would become a series of moves signaling alignment with conservative positions.

    In the same month, Meta made a pivotal decision to lift the special restrictions placed on Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts following the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This move effectively restored Trump’s access to Meta’s platforms, signaling the company’s willingness to embrace a more lenient approach toward the former president.

    By August, Zuckerberg escalated his rhetoric, criticizing the Biden administration for its handling of COVID-19 misinformation. He accused the government of pressuring Meta to censor content, a sharp contrast to the company’s earlier stance, which had taken a firm position against misleading health information during the pandemic.

    Further demonstrating his political pivot, Zuckerberg allowed a personal threat made by Trump to go unaddressed. Trump had released a book in which he ominously claimed Zuckerberg would “spend the rest of his life in prison” if he attempted to interfere with the 2024 election. Meta did not comment on the statement, an indication of the company’s increasing detachment from its previous, more critical stance toward Trump.

    Amid these changes, Meta’s corporate political action committee (PAC) notably refrained from donating to either of the major presidential candidates during the 2024 election cycle. However, individual Meta employees contributed heavily to Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, raising nearly $2 million, according to the transparency website OpenSecrets. The PAC also made contributions to both Republican and Democratic Senate campaigns, highlighting a more neutral posture in some respects, though the company’s recent leadership appointments have leaned more conservative.

    In December, Meta revealed that it had donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, signaling further support for the former president’s political future. Moreover, Zuckerberg made headlines last week by appointing Joel Kaplan, a longtime Republican insider, as Meta’s head of global policy, replacing Nick Clegg, a former British deputy prime minister with more liberal leanings. Kaplan’s appointment underscores Zuckerberg’s growing reliance on conservative political strategists.

    These moves have drawn sharp criticism from some observers. Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation expert, called Zuckerberg’s shift a “full bending of the knee to Trump” and criticized the company’s direction as part of a broader trend of tech leaders catering to right-wing agendas. Others, however, suggest Zuckerberg is simply trying to adapt to the political realities of the moment.

    David Sacks, a venture capitalist and Trump adviser, praised Zuckerberg’s decision, calling it a “turning point” in U.S. political and cultural realignment. Zuckerberg’s pivot is significant not only because of the potential return of Trump to power but also due to Meta’s dominant role in shaping online communication. Meta’s suite of apps—Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger—are among the most widely used platforms in the world, giving Zuckerberg immense influence over public discourse.

    Zuckerberg’s shift is not just about political convenience; it is also tied to the company’s financial and regulatory interests. Meta faces ongoing legal challenges, including a high-profile antitrust case brought by the Federal Trade Commission over its 2012 acquisition of Instagram. As Meta navigates these pressures, its increasingly conservative policy shift may also be a strategy to better align with a potential Republican administration, especially in light of the growing influence of right-leaning political figures within the company.

    Over the years, Zuckerberg has cultivated relationships with both Democratic and Republican leaders, from Obama to former House Speaker Paul Ryan. However, Meta’s top ranks have increasingly been filled by Republicans. Kaplan’s promotion is just one example of how the company is adjusting to shifting political tides. Other notable Republicans in Meta’s leadership include Jennifer Newstead, Meta’s chief legal officer, who previously served in the George W. Bush administration, and Kevin Martin, Meta’s new vice president of public policy, who also has deep ties to Republican administrations.

    Zuckerberg’s decision to hire key Republican operatives such as Dustin Carmack, a former adviser to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, reflects his growing embrace of conservative political strategies. Meta’s corporate culture has shifted significantly since Sheryl Sandberg, once the company’s most prominent Democrat, left her day-to-day role in 2022.

    Despite these moves, Zuckerberg insists that his shift is not a departure from his core values. In a recent video explaining the changes, he referenced a 2019 speech in which he criticized “traditional gatekeepers in politics or media,” suggesting that the latest policy adjustments were part of his long-standing vision to reduce content moderation.

    The coming years will reveal whether Zuckerberg’s pivot is part of a broader trend in corporate America or a strategic move aimed at positioning Meta for political and regulatory influence in a potential second Trump administration. However, with Meta’s growing influence over global communication and its increasing ties to conservative politics, the implications of Zuckerberg’s decision will be felt across the digital landscape for years to come.