Gayety

Author: Andy Lalwani

  • Rep. Sarah McBride Appointed Deputy Whip for Policy in 119th Congress

    Rep. Sarah McBride Appointed Deputy Whip for Policy in 119th Congress

    Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE), the first openly transgender person elected to the U.S. Congress, has been appointed Deputy Whip for Policy in the 119th Congress. The announcement marks a significant milestone in McBride’s political career as she continues to advocate for policy changes that directly impact the lives of working families, particularly in the areas of healthcare, housing, and child care.

    “I’m thrilled to be named a Deputy Whip for Policy in the 119th Congress, advising House Democratic Leadership on policy priorities and plans for our caucus,” McBride wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “Just as I was in the State Senate, I remain focused on lowering the cost of housing, health care, child care, and helping families thrive.”

    McBride’s appointment as Deputy Whip for Policy is a reflection of her growing influence within the Democratic Party, as well as her unwavering commitment to pushing forward progressive policies that prioritize the well-being of American families. McBride has made it clear that she intends to work on legislation aimed at reducing the financial burdens many families face, particularly in terms of affordable healthcare, housing, and childcare costs.

    My number one priority in Congress is helping to lower costs facing Delawareans and American families. We can do this by guaranteeing paid family and medical leave, lowering the cost of childcare and restoring the child tax credit.

    — Congresswoman Sarah McBride (@mcbride.house.gov) 2025-01-16T21:51:06.364Z

    On the social media platform Bluesky, McBride also shared her goals for the upcoming legislative session. “I want to make sure we pass bills that provide paid family and medical leave, lower the cost of childcare, and restore the child tax credit,” she stated, emphasizing her dedication to securing policies that provide economic relief to struggling families.

    Understanding the Role of a Whip in Congress

    In the U.S. House of Representatives, the role of a whip is essential for ensuring party discipline and unity when it comes to voting on legislation. A whip is responsible for rallying party members and ensuring they vote according to the party’s stance on important bills. The current Democratic whip is Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA), and McBride’s new position as Deputy Whip for Policy will see her assisting in the development of key policy initiatives and working with Democratic leadership to shape the legislative agenda.

    As Deputy Whip for Policy, McBride’s primary role will involve working closely with leadership to ensure that Democratic representatives are aligned on critical votes. She will also help drive discussions on policy priorities, particularly in areas that are close to her heart, including economic justice, healthcare access, and policies aimed at helping working families.

    McBride’s Historic Election and Legislative Priorities

    McBride made history in November 2022 when she became the first openly transgender person elected to the U.S. Congress. Her election to represent Delaware’s 1st District in the U.S. House of Representatives was widely seen as a victory for LGBTQ+ rights and a testament to the power of inclusivity in politics. In an interview on MSNBC after her win, McBride reflected on the significance of her historic election.

    “I think this victory is a testament to Delawarians,” she said. “In our state of neighbors, we are fair-minded, that we judge candidates based on their ideas and not their identities. And I think voters across the state of Delaware — Democrats, independents, and Republicans alike — responded to our message of building a government that respects all of us.”

    McBride’s campaign focused on policies aimed at supporting working families, regardless of party affiliation. “I was really singularly focused on bringing down costs facing workers, their families, and retirees,” she said. During her tenure in the Delaware Senate, McBride championed policies such as paid family and medical leave and led efforts to secure a substantial increase in the state’s Medicaid program. Her ability to work across the aisle, gaining bipartisan support, was a key aspect of her legislative success.

    In contrast to the GOP’s anti-trans messaging, McBride ran a campaign centered on unity and inclusivity, focusing on practical solutions for everyday Americans. “We put forward a positive, inclusive message during the course of this year-and-a-half-long campaign, and I think voters really responded to that,” she added.

    McBride’s Continued Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Rights

    As the first openly transgender member of Congress, McBride has also become an advocate for LGBTQ+ rights on the national stage. Throughout her career, she has fought to ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals have access to the same rights and protections as everyone else. Her historic election was seen as a step forward for LGBTQ+ representation in politics, and her role as Deputy Whip for Policy will undoubtedly amplify her voice in future policy discussions.

    McBride’s rise to leadership within the House Democratic Caucus is not only a victory for the LGBTQ+ community but also an indication of the growing influence of progressive voices within the party. Her advocacy for economic policies that benefit working families, combined with her commitment to LGBTQ+ rights, positions her as a key figure in shaping the direction of the 119th Congress.

    As McBride begins her role as Deputy Whip for Policy, all eyes will be on her as she works to help pass vital legislation that addresses issues such as paid family leave, the cost of childcare, and healthcare access. Her leadership promises to be a powerful force in the ongoing fight for economic and social justice in America.

    Rep. Sarah McBride’s appointment as Deputy Whip for Policy in the 119th Congress is a significant step in her political career and a testament to her unwavering commitment to progressive values. From advocating for affordable healthcare and housing to pushing for paid family and medical leave, McBride is dedicated to improving the lives of American families. As the first openly transgender person elected to Congress, McBride’s rise to leadership underscores the importance of diversity and inclusivity in shaping the nation’s legislative priorities.

  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Criticizes Disabled Transgender Student’s Top Surgery Decision

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Criticizes Disabled Transgender Student’s Top Surgery Decision

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has sparked controversy by criticizing the decision of a transgender college student, Micah Leroy, to undergo top surgery despite having cerebral palsy. Leroy, a student at the University of Minnesota, has garnered attention on social media for documenting his transition, including his journey with top surgery, a procedure often sought by transgender men to remove breast tissue.

    Greene, known for her vocal opposition to transgender rights, made the comments after anti-trans activist Oli London shared videos from Leroy’s Instagram account. London, who previously identified as trans and later detransitioned, misgendered Leroy and insinuated that Leroy’s disability, coupled with his use of a wheelchair, made him incapable of making his own medical decisions.

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Micah Leroy (@disabled_trans_boy)

    Leroy, who also experiences difficulty communicating through speech due to his condition, uses a speech-generating device to help with communication. Despite these challenges, Leroy has clearly advocated for himself in his transition process, which includes undergoing hormone therapy for over a year and actively engaging with medical professionals about his top surgery. Leroy, 23, posted on Instagram on December 28, 2024, celebrating one week post-op, and later shared a shirtless video showing the results of the surgery.

    In response to the video, London criticized Leroy’s choice, saying, “Doctors cut off the breasts of [a] disabled woman with cerebral palsy to turn her TRANS.” London’s comments, which were shared by Greene, implied that Leroy, due to his disability, lacked the agency to make his own decisions regarding his transition.

    Greene, amplifying London’s remarks, took to social media to declare: “This is criminal! What doctor did this? What hospital allowed this? Who paid for this?” There is no evidence to suggest that any laws or medical ethics were violated in Leroy’s decision to undergo surgery, nor is there any indication that Leroy was coerced or unable to make decisions for himself.

    Leroy responded to the backlash, telling The Daily Mail, “I am making my own decisions. I am my own legal guardian. And people don’t understand that.” He expressed frustration with the idea that his disability was being used as a reason to question his autonomy. Leroy further stated that he hoped his videos would spark a broader conversation about the rights of disabled and transgender individuals. “I want to help other people who are trans and disabled know that it’s okay,” Leroy said. “I want people to keep their minds open and not be bigots. People with disabilities are able to do whatever they f**king want.”

    Leroy’s experience highlights the harmful stereotype of infantilizing disabled individuals, treating them as incapable of making informed decisions about their lives. According to neuroscience student Hari Srinivasan, the infantilization of disabled people—treating them as if they are children regardless of their actual abilities—can have negative consequences on their mental health and hinder their personal development. In an article in Psychology Today, Srinivasan reflected on how disabled people often face microaggressions that diminish their agency, even in adulthood.

    The controversy surrounding Leroy’s surgery has sparked a wider conversation about the intersection of disability and transgender rights. Many advocates argue that disabled individuals, like all people, should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and their medical care. By undermining this autonomy, Greene and other critics risk perpetuating harmful narratives that disabled people cannot be trusted to make decisions for themselves.

    Rep. Greene has been a staunch critic of transgender rights, particularly when it comes to gender-affirming care for minors. She has introduced multiple pieces of legislation aimed at banning gender-affirming care for transgender teens, as well as making it more difficult for transgender adults to access such treatments. Greene’s comments about Leroy’s surgery are part of a broader pattern of her opposing the medical and personal rights of transgender individuals.

    Leroy’s public documentation of his transition is not only a personal journey but also an act of resistance against the discrimination faced by transgender people, particularly those with disabilities. Leroy has repeatedly emphasized that he wants to normalize the visibility of disabled trans individuals and challenge the prejudices that often go unchallenged.

    Leroy’s supporters, including LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, have rallied behind him, condemning the attacks from Greene and London. MassEquality, a leading LGBTQ+ organization in Massachusetts, issued a statement expressing solidarity with Leroy and urging lawmakers to focus on issues of equity and inclusion instead of attacking vulnerable communities.

    As the debate continues, Leroy’s story serves as a powerful reminder that all individuals, regardless of their disability status, deserve the right to make choices about their health and identity without fear of judgment or discrimination. While Greene’s remarks reflect a deeply polarized political climate surrounding transgender rights, they also highlight the growing need for increased awareness and acceptance of disabled transgender people in both the medical and social spheres.

  • Massachusetts’ First Nonbinary Elected Official Takes Hiatus Citing Transphobia and Toxic City Council Culture

    Massachusetts’ First Nonbinary Elected Official Takes Hiatus Citing Transphobia and Toxic City Council Culture

    Worcester City Councilor Thu Nguyen, Massachusetts’ first nonbinary elected official, has announced they are taking a month-long hiatus from their duties, citing an ongoing pattern of transphobia and a “discriminatory and toxic” culture within the city council. Nguyen made the announcement on Wednesday, January 15, 2025, stating that they would take time off to prioritize their mental and emotional well-being.

    Nguyen, who was elected in 2021, shared the decision in a statement sent to LGBTQ Nation, explaining that they have formally filed a complaint with the city’s Executive Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (EOE). In the complaint, Nguyen outlined their experiences of being misgendered by fellow councilors and the city’s mayor, Joseph M. Petty (D), during council sessions, further alleging that District 2 Councilor Candy Mero-Carlson had referred to them as “it” on multiple occasions.

    “These hateful acts are unbecoming of a legislative body whose duty is to serve our communities and honor anti-discrimination laws,” Nguyen wrote in the statement. “I have formally requested for the City of Worcester’s Chief Equity Officer to open an immediate investigation and create an action plan to address this matter.”

    Nguyen, who identifies as nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, emphasized that the complaint aims to hold public officials accountable and ensure that Worcester’s government aligns with legal and moral standards regarding the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals. The city councilor stressed that their decision to speak out stems from the broader context of increasing anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment, particularly toward transgender people, across the nation.

    “LGBTQ+ folks are facing more physical threats, violence, and hate all over the nation,” Nguyen said. “Many look to Massachusetts as a safe haven, but here in Worcester, our safety is compromised by government leadership that does not hold the same values of dignity and humanity for the LGBTQ+ community.”

    Nguyen’s announcement follows a contentious debate at Tuesday’s city council meeting, where the topic of remote participation was discussed. Nguyen expressed frustration with a recent order filed by Petty asking the Municipal and Legislative Operations Committee to review remote participation rules, a policy that Nguyen felt unfairly targeted them due to their own frequent remote attendance.

    During the meeting, Nguyen addressed the council, saying, “Under your leadership, I have felt unsafe around this council body. I have faced transphobia with being misgendered and recently learned that I have been dehumanized to the point where I’m being referred to as ‘it’ by my colleagues.”

    “I wish to have felt safe on this council floor, but I don’t,” Nguyen added.

    In response to Nguyen’s statement, Councilor Kathleen Toomey acknowledged that she had misgendered Nguyen when they were first elected, describing the incident as an “honest mistake.” Toomey apologized to Nguyen, adding that she did not intentionally misgender them after that point.

    “There’s never, ever been any attempt on my side to misgender them,” Toomey said. “If I did, I apologize.”

    Massachusetts LGBTQ+ advocacy group MassEquality has called for immediate action, urging the city to address Nguyen’s claims with greater transparency. In a statement released on Wednesday, the organization demanded a formal public apology and requested that Worcester implement comprehensive diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training for all city councilors and officials.

    “MassEquality stands with Councilor Nguyen in calling for lasting change,” the group stated. “This should include DEI training and structural changes to ensure that marginalized individuals, especially members of the LGBTQ+ community, are not subjected to discrimination or bigotry.”

    Worcester, the second-largest city in Massachusetts, is known for its progressive stance on LGBTQ+ rights, with a reputation for being a sanctuary for queer individuals in the state. However, Nguyen’s experience has underscored the challenges that LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly transgender and nonbinary people, continue to face within political structures, even in cities that are widely regarded as inclusive.

    In their statement, Nguyen called on the public to advocate for a “political reimagination” that includes a holistic commitment to the care and dignity of LGBTQ+ individuals.

    “We hope that by speaking up against transphobia and hate, many of you will join me in pushing for a government that truly serves everyone, which rightfully includes the LGBTQ+ community,” Nguyen wrote.

    As Nguyen takes time off to focus on their personal well-being, the city of Worcester now faces pressure from both local and statewide organizations to address the allegations and ensure a more inclusive and supportive environment for all public officials and residents.

  • Montana Republicans Pass Bathroom Ban Despite Pleas from Trans Lawmakers

    Montana Republicans Pass Bathroom Ban Despite Pleas from Trans Lawmakers

    Montana Republican lawmakers in the state’s House of Representatives voted Thursday to pass a controversial bill that would ban transgender people from using restrooms in public buildings that align with their gender identity. The bill, which now heads to the state Senate, passed by a 58-42 party-line vote.

    Introduced by Rep. Kerri Seekins-Crowe (R), the bill specifically targets public facilities, including schools, prisons, jails, and domestic violence shelters. It would prevent transgender individuals from using restrooms consistent with their gender identity in these places. Additionally, the legislation allows anyone who encounters a transgender or nonbinary person in a restroom to file a lawsuit against that person or the facility’s administrators, up to two years after the encounter.

    Lawmakers Speak Out

    During debate, Democratic Reps. Zooey Zephyr and SJ Howell, both transgender, expressed their deep concern about the bill’s potential impact on their lives and the transgender community. Zephyr, who has been a vocal advocate for trans rights, said the bill would exacerbate the challenges already faced by transgender people in Montana. “Trans people walk through the state of Montana afraid enough already,” Zephyr said. “Leave trans people alone. Let me be the woman I’m happy to be. Let me live my life.”

    Zephyr’s impassioned plea for understanding was met with little support from Republican lawmakers, who argued that the bill is necessary to protect the privacy and safety of women. Seekins-Crowe, who has previously made inflammatory statements about transgender people, argued that the bill is a response to “cultural trends” threatening women’s rights. She claimed that the legislation would help protect women’s privacy, although there is no evidence to suggest that transgender women pose any threat to cisgender women in public restrooms.

    Controversial Arguments for the Bill

    In addition to concerns about privacy and safety, some Republican lawmakers presented another argument for the bathroom ban, claiming that certain transgender women—specifically lesbians—should be excluded from women’s restrooms. State Rep. Jedediah Hinkle (R) pointed to a trans woman he knew who was attracted to women, suggesting that her presence in a women’s restroom was somehow inappropriate because of her sexual orientation.

    “So we have an individual who is dressing like a woman, changing [their] name to a woman but is also at the same time attracted to women,” Hinkle said during the debate, misunderstanding the concept of lesbianism, which is the sexual attraction between women. Hinkle’s comments seemed to conflate transgender identity with voyeurism, invoking an example of a cisgender male janitor who allegedly misused women’s restrooms in the past. This remark appeared to be a misguided attempt to frame transgender people as potential threats, despite there being no evidence of such behaviors among transgender individuals.

    The bill’s supporters argue that it’s vital to safeguard women’s spaces, but critics contend that it unfairly targets transgender people and could lead to increased discrimination and harassment.

    Next Steps for the Bill

    The bathroom ban bill is not yet law. After passing the House, it must be voted on once again in the state House before moving to the state Senate, where Republicans hold a majority. If the Senate passes the bill, it will be sent to Governor Greg Gianforte, who has yet to publicly state his position on the measure.

    In December, Montana lawmakers had already voted down a proposed amendment that would have banned transgender individuals from using appropriate restrooms in the state Capitol. However, the latest bill represents a significant step in a broader trend of anti-trans legislation sweeping several U.S. states.

    Backlash and Community Reactions

    The bill has sparked widespread backlash from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, who argue that it is part of a broader effort to roll back trans rights. Montana’s transgender community, along with national civil rights organizations, have condemned the bill, calling it discriminatory and harmful to vulnerable individuals.

    “Trans people already face significant barriers in accessing public facilities and services,” said a representative from the Montana LGBTQ+ advocacy group. “This bill will only further marginalize an already vulnerable community and make it harder for transgender people to live their lives safely and authentically.”

    As the debate continues in Montana, the outcome of this bill could have wider implications for other states considering similar legislation. Activists vow to continue fighting for transgender rights and protections in Montana and beyond.

  • Winter Party Festival Returns to Miami Beach for 32nd Year, Raising Funds for The National LGBTQ Task Force

    Winter Party Festival Returns to Miami Beach for 32nd Year, Raising Funds for The National LGBTQ Task Force

    The Winter Party Festival, one of the most iconic celebrations of LGBTQ+ culture, will return to Miami Beach for its 32nd annual edition, scheduled to take place from February 26 to March 4, 2025. The week-long festival, organized by the National LGBTQ Task Force, brings together thousands of international attendees to raise vital funds for local and national LGBTQ+ organizations while celebrating queer joy, unity, and the power of dance.

    This year’s theme, “Dance is Revolution,” captures the essence of the festival’s enduring message — to live freely, play hard, and give back. With over 12 events at 10 premier venues across Miami and Miami Beach, the festival promises a high-energy mix of music, performances, and community engagement that has made it a cornerstone of queer culture.

    A Longstanding Tradition of Advocacy and Celebration

    Since its founding in 1994, Winter Party has become a pillar of the LGBTQ+ community, providing a safe and inclusive space for individuals to celebrate their identities. More than just a party, the festival raises critical funds that benefit LGBTQ+ causes. A significant portion of the proceeds from Winter Party, as well as the National LGBTQ Task Force Gala, goes to the LGBTQ+ Equity Fund, a collaboration between the National LGBTQ Task Force, Our Fund Foundation, and The Miami Foundation.

    This philanthropic effort has had a lasting impact in South Florida, with the Task Force contributing over $3.8 million since 2005, supporting more than 100 community organizations. These funds help advocate for LGBTQ+ rights locally and nationally, with a focus on social justice initiatives that impact marginalized communities.

    Kierra Johnson, President of the National LGBTQ Task Force, expressed the importance of Winter Party as both a celebration and a response to the challenges facing the LGBTQ+ community. “For those who’ve joined us before, you know this week-long symphony of music and movement is part of what unites us to celebrate, connect, and honor the joy that fuels our strength,” she said. “Florida has become a testing ground for harmful policies aimed at suppressing our existence, making Winter Party not just a celebration but a declaration of resistance.”

    Embrace the sun, feel the ocean breeze, and dance with us at Winter Party’s flagship event: The Beach Party on the Sands of South Beach! Come experience Winter Party’s iconic celebration of joy and dance revolution with beats by the incredible Erik Vilar and Micky Friedmann.
    Embrace the sun, feel the ocean breeze, and dance with us at Winter Party’s flagship event: The Beach Party on the Sands of South Beach! Come experience Winter Party’s iconic celebration of joy and dance revolution with beats by the incredible Erik Vilar and Micky Friedmann.

    World-Class Entertainment and Global Attendance

    The Winter Party Festival consistently attracts over 10,000 attendees from around the world, and the 2025 event promises to continue this tradition. Festivalgoers will enjoy performances from some of the world’s top DJs, including Chus, Karsten Sollors, and Tom Stephen, as well as an exciting lineup of fresh talent.

    Jason Hellinger, Winter Party Festival Co-Chair, highlighted the festival’s evolution and commitment to bringing world-class talent to the event. “We’re bringing a world-class DJ roster, including international talent and fresh faces to shake up the lineup,” he said. “We want all of our guests to feel the love our volunteers put into the festival while dancing alongside your chosen family. Prepare for a dance revolution.”

    The Winter Party experience is known for its vibrant, welcoming atmosphere, with events held at some of Miami’s most renowned venues. From intimate gatherings to large-scale dance parties, the festival is designed to celebrate diversity and foster connections within the LGBTQ+ community.

    You asked for it and we delivered! Under One Sun is returning to South Beach as a Pool Party for the first time since 2018!!! We can’t wait to welcome you to the Sagamore South Beach pool deck for an afternoon of sensational music, movement, and Miami sunshine. Get ready for a day filled with the best poolside vibes on Miami Beach. Let’s go down to the POOL!!
    You asked for it and we delivered! Under One Sun is returning to South Beach as a Pool Party for the first time since 2018!!! We can’t wait to welcome you to the Sagamore South Beach pool deck for an afternoon of sensational music, movement, and Miami sunshine. Get ready for a day filled with the best poolside vibes on Miami Beach. Let’s go down to the Pool!

    Key Events and Highlights for 2025

    This year’s festival includes several exciting events, many of which are returning favorites.

    • LOCALIZE: Sponsored by health partners Avita Pharmacy and Prevention 305, this free event on Thursday, February 27, offers a space for networking and community building.
    • Ignite: On the same day, Thursday, February 27, Winter Party will team up with Midnight Service for an event that merges the energy of dance with a “religious experience.” DJ Dangerous Rose will headline the evening.
    • VIP Cocktail Reception: On Friday, February 28, the National LGBTQ Task Force will honor community advocate Lisa Mercado at the VIP Cocktail Reception at The Standard Miami Beach. Mercado’s contributions to Winter Party, as well as her work with Pridelines, have made her a beloved figure in the South Florida LGBTQ+ community.
    • Under One Sun: This signature daytime event, returning to the Sagamore pool on Saturday, March 1, will feature DJs Dawson and Deanne. This will be the first time Under One Sun is held at a pool since 2018.
    • Beach Party: On Sunday, March 2, the iconic Beach Party will return to the sands of Miami Beach, featuring DJs Micky Friedmann and Erik Vilar. This year, the entrance will be located two blocks south of the traditional entrance, at 10th Street.

    Sponsors and Media Partners

    The Winter Party Festival is made possible through the support of various sponsors, including the Miami Beach Visitor & Convention Authority, Miami-Dade County Tourism Development Council, and additional partners. Media sponsors for the event include Edge Media, equalpride, Hotspots! Magazine, Boi Magazine, Funqtion, and Get Out! Magazine, among others.

    How to Get Involved

    Tickets for individual events and full festival passes are available for purchase now. Those interested in attending can reserve their spots through the festival’s official website. Press credentials are also available upon request for media covering the event.

    As the LGBTQ+ community continues to face challenges, particularly in states like Florida, the Winter Party Festival serves as a vital reminder of the strength and resilience of queer culture. With its blend of celebration and advocacy, the event remains a beacon of joy and activism.

    For more information on tickets, event details, and press inquiries, visit Winter Party Festival website.

    About the National LGBTQ Task Force

    The National LGBTQ Task Force is a leading organization dedicated to advancing full freedom, justice, and equality for LGBTQ+ individuals. By advocating for social change and mobilizing activists, the Task Force works to eliminate barriers facing LGBTQ+ people in areas like housing, employment, healthcare, and basic human rights. Through events like Winter Party, the Task Force continues to build a future where all individuals can live authentically and without fear of discrimination.

  • Pro Handball Player Villads Raahauge Jensen Comes Out as Gay

    Pro Handball Player Villads Raahauge Jensen Comes Out as Gay

    Danish professional handball player Villads Raahauge Jensen has publicly come out as gay, marking a significant moment in the world of sports. The 28-year-old attacking player, who currently competes for Lugi HF in Sweden’s second-tier Allsvenskan league, shared the news in an emotional Instagram post on Sunday, revealing his sexuality to the public after years of personal struggle.

    In the post, Jensen shared a photo of himself as a young boy alongside the simple yet profound message: “I am gay.” He went on to explain that while those three words should be easy to say, they have been difficult for him to express, noting the fear and uncertainty he had carried for years about revealing his true self.

    “I’ve been thinking of posting a post like this for a long time, and have been thinking if this was the right way to come out. But there is probably no right or wrong way,” Jensen wrote in his Instagram caption. “For many years I’ve been afraid to be open about it. But now, I am finally ready to say it.”

    Jensen, who stands at 6ft 4in, has had an impressive handball career, playing for some of Europe’s top clubs. Born in Copenhagen, he began his career with Ajax in his hometown before moving on to various teams, including OV Helsingborg in Sweden and Haslum in Norway. In March 2024, he returned to Sweden to join Lugi HF, which competes in the Allsvenskan league. While the team was relegated at the end of last season, Jensen has continued to contribute his talents to the sport.

    Support from Teammates and Club

    In a recent interview with Swedish newspaper Sydsvenskan, Jensen opened up about the challenges he faced in coming to terms with his sexuality while playing professional sports. He explained that although he has never been ashamed of being gay, he still felt the weight of the taboo surrounding homosexuality in athletics.

    “I don’t want anyone to think that I’m ashamed of being gay, because that’s not the case,” Jensen said. “But it is a taboo in sports. It’s hard to be open about it because you don’t know how people will react.”

    Jensen’s decision to come out was met with a wave of support from his teammates. After sharing his news with his Lugi HF colleagues via a message, the response was overwhelmingly positive. “Everyone was supportive, giving him high fives and pats on the back,” according to reports by Omni.

    The player expressed his gratitude for the support he received and reflected on the relief he felt after being open about his sexuality. “Although my closest friends and family have known for some time, it’s still scary to tell something you’ve kept secret for so long,” Jensen said. “Hiding a large part of who you are from almost all people makes it difficult to fully be yourself.”

    Lugi HF also expressed their support in a Facebook post, describing Jensen as “strong and unique” for being open about his identity. His bravery is seen as an important step in creating a more inclusive environment within the world of sports.

    A Step Forward for LGBTQ+ Visibility in Handball

    Jensen’s coming out follows a small but growing trend of LGBTQ+ athletes in handball. In April 2022, Norwegian player Ola Hoftun Lillelien came out as gay, and he continues to play for Drammen HK. Danish player Jacob Bjørn Hessellund also came out in 2022, and later transitioned into coaching. Another prominent handball player, German Lucas Krzikalla, came out in 2022 and still plays for SC DHfK Leipzig.

    While there have been openly gay players in women’s handball, there has yet to be a publicly out gay athlete in men’s Olympic handball competitions. However, the growing visibility of LGBTQ+ players in handball and other sports is helping to break down barriers and foster greater acceptance in the athletic community.

    Jensen hopes his decision to come out will encourage others to embrace their authentic selves and show that it’s possible to be both gay and successful in sports. “I hope that with this post, I can help others, and maybe be a role model to show that it is OK to be gay in the world of sports,” he wrote.

    While Jensen acknowledged the challenges he faced in coming out, he stressed that his identity as a person extends beyond his sexuality. “I’m still just Villads,” he said. “Yes, I’m gay, but I am also so much more than that.”

    The Ongoing Fight for LGBTQ+ Representation

    Jensen’s story reflects a larger cultural shift in sports, where LGBTQ+ athletes are increasingly coming forward and sharing their experiences. Though barriers remain, including the stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ athletes in some sports, the support for players like Jensen is growing. His courage has made a powerful statement in the handball world, and his hope is that future generations will find it easier to be open about their identities.

    As the sports world continues to evolve, Jensen’s decision to publicly embrace his true self may serve as a catalyst for greater acceptance, both in handball and beyond. His journey represents not only personal triumph but also a step forward in making the world of sports more inclusive for everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation.

  • Comedian and Actor Tony Slattery Dies at 65 After Heart Attack

    Comedian and Actor Tony Slattery Dies at 65 After Heart Attack

    Tony Slattery, the beloved gay comedian and actor best known for his appearances on the iconic Channel 4 show Whose Line Is It Anyway?, has died at the age of 65 after suffering a heart attack. His partner, Mark Michael Hutchinson, confirmed the news on Tuesday, January 14, stating that Slattery passed away following a heart attack on Sunday, January 12.

    Slattery’s death marks the end of a storied career in comedy and film. He had become a familiar face on British television, appearing on Whose Line Is It Anyway? from 1988 to 1995, where his quick wit and improvisational skills made him a fan favorite. In addition to his work on the show, Slattery was known for his roles in notable films such as The Crying Game, To Die For, and Peter’s Friends. His versatility as both a comedian and actor earned him critical acclaim throughout his career.

    Slattery’s partner of over 30 years, Mark Michael Hutchinson, shared the news of his passing with the public, expressing deep sorrow. “It is with great sadness we must announce that actor and comedian Tony Slattery, aged 65, has passed away today, Tuesday morning, following a heart attack on Sunday evening,” Hutchinson said in a statement.

    Mental Health Advocacy and Documentary

    Slattery was open about his personal struggles with mental health, including his diagnosis of bipolar disorder. In 2020, he released a BBC documentary titled What’s The Matter With Tony Slattery?, which explored his challenges with mental health and addiction. The documentary also featured interviews with Slattery and Hutchinson, who spoke candidly about their experiences and sought to raise awareness about mental health issues.

    Throughout his career, Slattery became a prominent advocate for mental health, using his platform to highlight the importance of mental well-being and to share his own journey with the public. His bravery in discussing his personal battles made him a figure of inspiration for many who faced similar struggles.

    Tributes Pour In from Comedians and Actors

    As news of Slattery’s passing spread, many in the entertainment world took to social media to pay tribute to the actor and comedian. Comedian Alexander Fox shared his memories of Slattery on Twitter/X, recalling how the actor “couldn’t have been more kind and thoughtful” when they met at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Fox also described Slattery as someone who had “an immense influence on the comedy world.”

    Writer Jason Reid, who had crossed paths with Slattery in London’s Soho district, tweeted: “Sad news that Tony Slattery has died. A very funny and talented man who struggled with addiction. I used to see him out in Soho late at night in a bar I went to, he was always very nice. Thoughts are with his loved ones.”

    Paul Carmichael, a writer and podcaster, also shared his heartfelt condolences, posting an image of himself with Slattery on Twitter/X. “My lovely, lovely chum. I shall miss you so very much. #TonySlattery,” Carmichael wrote.

    Erica Lear, an interviewer and producer who worked closely with Slattery, expressed her sorrow by recalling their friendship. “I will miss my mischievous partner in crime. They say you should never meet your heroes, but I met mine and he became my best friend,” Lear said.

    A Longtime Presence in British Comedy

    Slattery’s legacy as a comedian was built over decades, beginning in the 1980s. His charm and sharp improvisational skills made him an integral part of the British comedy scene. His work on Whose Line Is It Anyway?, where he starred alongside Hugh Laurie, Stephen Fry, and Jennifer Saunders, helped solidify his reputation as one of the best comedic talents of his generation.

    In addition to his television appearances, Slattery made an impact on the stage, earning an Olivier Award nomination for Best Comedy Performance for his role in the play Neville’s Island. His work in theatre was marked by his ability to bring a unique energy and humor to every performance, further cementing his place as one of Britain’s finest comic actors.

    A Legacy of Humor and Compassion

    Tony Slattery’s death has left a profound impact on the world of comedy and beyond. His contributions to television, film, and theatre remain beloved by fans, and his openness about mental health struggles continues to resonate with many who admired his courage and vulnerability. His legacy will be remembered not just for his comedic talents, but for the kindness and compassion he showed to those around him.

    As the world mourns the loss of Tony Slattery, his influence on British comedy and his advocacy for mental health awareness will live on through the work he left behind.

  • House Passes Bill Banning Transgender Women and Girls from School Sports

    House Passes Bill Banning Transgender Women and Girls from School Sports

    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a contentious bill that would ban transgender women and girls from competing in women’s sports at public schools and colleges. The legislation, which has sparked fierce debates on both sides of the political spectrum, was approved by the Republican-controlled chamber on January 14, 2025. The vote marks a significant step in ongoing efforts by conservative lawmakers to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in competitive sports.

    The bill, known as the Protection of Women’s Sports Act, seeks to ensure that only cisgender women are allowed to compete in women’s sports, asserting that the inclusion of transgender athletes — particularly transgender women — creates an “unfair” advantage. Supporters of the bill argue that biological differences between men and women give transgender women an athletic edge that undermines fairness in women’s sports.

    However, the bill’s passage has drawn intense criticism from human rights organizations, civil rights groups, and advocates for transgender rights, who argue that it discriminates against transgender youth and limits opportunities for participation in school sports.

    Over 400 Organizations Oppose the Bill

    More than 400 human rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), called on lawmakers to reject the bill, stating that it “does not address the longstanding barriers all girls and women have faced in their pursuit of athletics.” They contend that the legislation is based on unfounded claims and misconceptions about transgender athletes, and that it unfairly targets a vulnerable group of young people.

    “Transgender girls and women have every right to participate in sports, just like anyone else,” said Kierra Johnson, executive director of the National LGBTQ Task Force. “This bill is a solution in search of a problem, and it’s rooted in harmful stereotypes and fearmongering. Rather than focusing on inclusivity and fairness, this bill seeks to exclude and stigmatize a group of students who are already marginalized.”

    The Impact on Transgender Athletes

    For transgender athletes, the bill represents another hurdle in their struggle for acceptance and equal treatment in sports. Many transgender students already face significant challenges when it comes to accessing sports programs that are inclusive and affirming of their identities. These obstacles include lack of access to appropriate facilities, discriminatory policies, and a general lack of understanding of the unique needs of transgender youth.

    Opponents of the bill emphasize that transgender women and girls do not have inherent athletic advantages over cisgender athletes, and argue that banning them from school sports will not only harm the individuals affected but also send a damaging message to the broader society about acceptance and inclusion.

    “The consequences of this bill are devastating, not just for transgender students, but for the spirit of sportsmanship and equality that should define school athletics,” said Tori Cooper, director of community engagement for the HRC’s Transgender Justice Initiative. “This bill would isolate and stigmatize trans athletes, many of whom have already faced considerable challenges in their lives.”

    The Politics Behind the Legislation

    The Protection of Women’s Sports Act is part of a broader wave of conservative-backed legislation aimed at restricting the rights of transgender individuals. The bill, which is now headed to the Senate for consideration, is viewed by many as a direct response to the increasing visibility and rights of transgender people, particularly transgender youth.

    Conservative lawmakers argue that the participation of transgender women in women’s sports undermines fairness and the integrity of female athletic competition. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), one of the bill’s supporters, stated during the debate, “Allowing biological males to compete against women in sports is not only unfair, it’s dangerous. We need to protect our daughters and give them the same opportunities we had growing up.”

    However, critics argue that these claims are based on misconceptions about transgender athletes and ignore the challenges that transgender women face in athletic competition, including the need to meet hormone and other medical requirements before competing.

    Legal and Public Backlash

    The bill’s passage in the House is not the final word on the matter. If the legislation moves forward in the Senate, it could face substantial legal challenges from civil rights organizations and transgender advocates, who argue that the bill violates constitutional protections against discrimination and equal treatment.

    President Joe Biden has spoken out against similar bills in the past, arguing that they are discriminatory and harmful to transgender people. The Biden administration has made clear its commitment to defending the rights of transgender individuals, including their right to participate in sports and other activities without facing discrimination.

    “The right to participate in sports is a fundamental part of being a student,” President Biden said during a speech last year. “No one should be excluded from school sports based on their gender identity.”

    In response to the legislation, transgender athletes and their allies have pledged to continue advocating for equal rights and fighting the bill in court if it is passed by the Senate. Several states, including Utah, South Carolina, and Arkansas, have already passed similar laws banning transgender women from competing in women’s sports, but legal challenges in those states are ongoing.

    Looking Ahead

    As the bill moves through the legislative process, both supporters and opponents of the bill are bracing for a protracted battle. Supporters argue that it’s necessary to protect the integrity of women’s sports, while opponents warn that the bill would be a devastating blow to the rights and dignity of transgender youth.

    With the bill’s future uncertain in the Senate, it is clear that the fight over transgender rights in sports is far from over. The outcome of this debate will have lasting implications for how transgender individuals are treated in sports, education, and society at large.

  • Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Allegedly Orders Removal of Tampons from Men’s Bathrooms in Controversial Policy Shift

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Allegedly Orders Removal of Tampons from Men’s Bathrooms in Controversial Policy Shift

    Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly ordered the removal of tampons from men’s bathrooms across the company’s offices in Silicon Valley, New York, and Texas. The move, which affects restrooms previously equipped with tampons for trans and nonbinary employees, is part of a broader series of policy changes at the company that critics say signal a shift toward more anti-LGBTQ+ stances.

    According to sources familiar with the decision, the removal of tampons is one of several actions in a sweeping series of changes that Zuckerberg has implemented in recent months. These changes, which some argue reflect a more conservative approach, have sparked outrage among employees and LGBTQ+ advocates.

    A Shift in Meta’s Policies

    The tampon removal follows other controversial policy changes at Meta, including the company’s decision to loosen its hate speech policies. Last week, Zuckerberg announced that the company would reduce its reliance on content moderators and fact-checkers, a move that will allow more controversial content to remain on its platforms. This includes content that may promote harmful rhetoric about LGBTQ+ individuals, such as referring to them as “mentally ill.”

    Meta also recently ended its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices in hiring, training, and supplier selection. These policies, which had been a key component of the company’s commitment to inclusivity, are now being rolled back. Additionally, Zuckerberg has reportedly authorized the deletion of nonbinary and transgender themes from Meta’s Messenger app, which had previously been available for several years.

    Zuckerberg’s Comments Fuel Backlash

    Zuckerberg’s recent actions appear to be part of a broader strategy to align the company with more conservative viewpoints, a shift that some believe is connected to the rise of Donald Trump’s political influence. In a recent interview with popular anti-LGBTQ+ podcaster Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg praised what he called “masculine energy” in business, while expressing optimism about Trump’s second term. Zuckerberg, a major political donor, is one of several tech CEOs who contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund.

    The CEO’s public remarks have fueled speculation that his decisions at Meta are increasingly influenced by his personal views, as well as a desire to align the company with the political climate that has gained momentum under Trump’s influence. In December, Zuckerberg convened a series of confidential meetings with top executives to discuss these changes, a departure from the company’s traditional decision-making process, which typically involves broader input from employees and leadership.

    Employee Reactions: Anger and Disillusionment

    The policy changes have been met with widespread anger from Meta’s workforce, particularly among employees who identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community. One employee told 404 Media, “No one is excited or happy about these changes. And obviously, the employees who identify as being part of the LGBTQ+ community are especially unhappy and feel the most unsupported in this. A small number of people are taking time off and are sharing that they are considering leaving the company due to this change.”

    Another Meta employee expressed frustration with the direction the company is taking, saying, “I find it very hard to understand how explicitly carving out which groups of marginalized people can have hate speech directed at them will be beneficial for the communities we hope to build on our platforms.”

    Widespread Criticism from LGBTQ+ Groups and Public Figures

    The changes have drawn sharp criticism from LGBTQ+ rights organizations and public figures, including President Joe Biden. Biden recently condemned Meta’s decision to remove fact-checking policies and loosen its hate speech guidelines, calling it “shameful” and expressing concern over the potential harm these changes could cause to marginalized communities.

    LGBTQ+ advocates have voiced particular concern about the tampon removal, arguing that it is part of a broader pattern of erasing support for trans and nonbinary individuals. “It’s a clear message that the company no longer values the needs and rights of LGBTQ+ employees,” said one advocate, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.

    Zuckerberg’s Political and Personal Views at the Forefront

    Several reports suggest that Zuckerberg’s policy changes are not just a response to shifting political dynamics in the U.S., but also a reflection of his personal views. Sources close to the company say that Zuckerberg, emboldened by Trump’s political success, is now more openly expressing his conservative leanings. One insider stated, “He no longer wants to keep those views quiet, and he is pushing Meta to reflect that.”

    The company’s pivot is seen as a direct response to what Zuckerberg perceives as a growing conservative movement in the United States, one that values traditional, “masculine” business practices and rejects what some view as the excesses of the previous era’s focus on diversity and inclusion.

    Impact on Meta’s Reputation and Future

    As Meta continues to roll out these controversial changes, the company’s reputation among its diverse employee base and the general public is being tested. Many employees fear that the company’s shift toward more conservative values will undermine the inclusivity that has been central to Meta’s image, especially among younger and more progressive demographics.

    The removal of tampons from men’s bathrooms, in particular, has ignited conversations about the importance of maintaining inclusive policies that recognize the needs of transgender and nonbinary individuals. Critics argue that such moves could alienate a significant portion of the LGBTQ+ community and damage Meta’s standing as a tech leader committed to social progress.

    While Zuckerberg’s decisions have sparked significant backlash, the CEO appears undeterred, confident that his approach will help position Meta for success in an increasingly polarized political climate. Whether this shift will pay off in the long run remains to be seen, as Meta navigates the complexities of balancing corporate values with the demands of an evolving social and political landscape.

  • Beloved Lesbian Bar in Los Angeles Closes Due to Wildfire Impact Leaving Only One Left in Major City

    Beloved Lesbian Bar in Los Angeles Closes Due to Wildfire Impact Leaving Only One Left in Major City

    The devastating wildfires sweeping across Los Angeles have claimed 24 lives in just a week, leaving a trail of destruction that has impacted homes, businesses, and communities throughout the city. Among the casualties is The Ruby Fruit, a beloved lesbian bar in the Silver Lake neighborhood that had served as a vital gathering spot for the LGBTQ+ community.

    On Sunday, the bar’s owners, Emily Bielagus and Mara Herbkersman, shared the heartbreaking news on Instagram that The Ruby Fruit would be closing its doors due to the financial strain caused by the ongoing disaster. “We have come to the heartbreaking decision that at this time, operating The Ruby Fruit is no longer possible due to financial impact from the current natural disaster,” the post read.

    A Rare Sanctuary for LGBTQ+ Women

    Opened in 2023, The Ruby Fruit was a rare addition to the shrinking number of lesbian bars across the United States. Located in a small strip mall on Sunset Boulevard, the bar became a vital hub for LGBTQ+ women in Los Angeles. At the time of its opening, it was the only bar dedicated to lesbian women in the city, a distinction that was later shared by Honey’s at Star Love in East Hollywood.

    In a country where lesbian bars have become increasingly rare, the closure of The Ruby Fruit marks a significant loss for the LGBTQ+ community. According to The Lesbian Bar Project, the number of lesbian bars in the U.S. dropped from over 200 in 1980 to just 24 by 2021. Despite these challenges, a small resurgence in recent years had breathed new life into establishments like The Ruby Fruit, which quickly garnered a loyal following.

    The bar’s name was inspired by Rita Mae Brown’s 1973 novel Rubyfruit Jungle, a groundbreaking coming-of-age story about a lesbian woman’s journey to self-acceptance. For co-owners Bielagus and Herbkersman, the name was a tribute to the book’s legacy and its role in queer literary history.

    A Space for Community

    Though only 500 square feet, The Ruby Fruit had an outsized impact on the local LGBTQ+ scene. The bar’s intimate setting allowed it to function not only as a bar but also as a community space where queer individuals could feel seen and supported. In an interview with Condé Nast Traveler, Herbkersman described how the space evolved beyond a restaurant, becoming a hub for connection and inclusion.

    “After we opened The Ruby Fruit, we quickly learned that we had to function as not just a restaurant but a community space,” Herbkersman said. “The queer community is full of diversity and nuance. We want to create a little bit of space for everyone to feel at home.”

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by The Ruby Fruit (@therubyfruit)

    The bar hosted a variety of regular programming, including TRANScendent Tuesdays, a gender-expansive mixer, and other popular events like Queereoke and Verse4Verse Poetry, a queer open mic night. These events brought together a diverse range of people from across the LGBTQ+ spectrum, fostering a sense of belonging and mutual support. On many nights, the bar’s small space would overflow into the parking lot, a testament to its popularity and the strong sense of community it had cultivated.

    Wildfires Devastate Los Angeles

    The ongoing wildfires have affected many businesses and residents across Los Angeles, but the impact on The Ruby Fruit was particularly devastating. Bielagus and Herbkersman explained that the financial realities of operating the business in the aftermath of the fires made it impossible to continue.

    “The hospitality industry functions on a day-by-day basis and right now, as they say — the math just isn’t mathing,” the co-owners wrote in their farewell post.

    Despite the bar’s closure, Bielagus and Herbkersman are still using the space to give back to the community. They have transformed The Ruby Fruit into a donation drop-off and distribution center for victims of the wildfires. “Even as we write this, we have folks filling their cars and driving supplies to area shelters and resource centers,” the post continued. “Please keep an eye on this Instagram account for more information regarding that.”

    In the wake of the closure, both owners expressed their gratitude for the support they received over the past two years. “There isn’t much more to say beyond: we love you, LA. We love you, queer fam. We are grateful for the support you’ve shown us,” they wrote. “Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.”

    A Loss for the Queer Community

    The loss of The Ruby Fruit is a particularly painful blow to the LGBTQ+ community in Los Angeles, a city that has long been seen as a haven for queer individuals seeking support and acceptance. The bar’s closure highlights the broader struggles faced by many small businesses in the hospitality industry, especially those serving marginalized communities.

    For many, The Ruby Fruit was more than just a place to grab a drink; it was a safe haven where queer individuals could be themselves without fear of judgment. Its closure underscores the devastating toll the wildfires have taken on the city and the fragility of spaces that serve as essential cultural and social resources for vulnerable populations.

    As Los Angeles continues to grapple with the aftermath of the fires, the legacy of The Ruby Fruit will live on in the memories of those whose lives were touched by the bar’s unique spirit and its commitment to building a welcoming, inclusive community.